Unveiling the Perils of the Average Consumer: Confusion Based Disputes in European Trademark Law

In the captivating realm of trademark law, one enigmatic concept stands tall: the average consumer. As a legal construct, this elusive figure serves as the benchmark against which courts assess the likelihood of confusion between trademarks. Yet, determining who this average consumer is remains an intricate endeavor, shrouded in layers of complexity.

The Average Consumer in Confusion-based Disputes in European Trademark Law and Similar Fictions

4 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	1331 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	783 pages

FREE

This article delves into the enigmatic world of the average consumer, exploring its pivotal role in confusion-based disputes within the European Trademark Law landscape. Through a meticulous examination of case law, scholarly perspectives, and practical implications, we strive to unravel the essence of this legal abstraction.

The Elusive Average Consumer

Central to confusion-based disputes is the presumption of an average consumer. This idealized figure, often described as a "hypothetical and typical" individual, is believed to possess a certain degree of attention, knowledge, and experience concerning the relevant market.

Delving into the archives of European case law, one encounters a plethora of attempts to define the average consumer. In the seminal case of Canon Kabushiki Kaisha v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc. (C-39/97),the European Court of Justice (ECJ) held that the average consumer is "an average person, reasonably well-informed and reasonably observant and circumspect."

However, the challenge lies not in defining the average consumer but in applying this abstraction to real-life scenarios. Courts must grapple with the multifaceted nature of consumers, recognizing that their knowledge, experience, and expectations vary across different markets and products.

Assessing the Likelihood of Confusion

The average consumer serves as a lynchpin in determining the likelihood of confusion between trademarks. Courts consider a multitude of factors, including:

• The similarity of the marks
• The proximity of the goods or services
• The degree of attention paid by consumers
• The strength of the earlier mark

The ECJ has emphasized that the test for confusion is not based on the subjective perception of a single individual but rather on the overall impression created in the minds of the average consumer. This holistic approach ensures a balanced and equitable evaluation.

Confusion in Practice

Confusion-based disputes play out in a diverse array of industries, from fashion to pharmaceuticals. Let us consider a few illustrative examples:

• The Adidas Case: In 2019, Adidas successfully defended its iconic three-stripe trademark against a similar design used by the Belgian company Shoe Branding Europe. The ECJ ruled that the average consumer would likely be confused between the two marks, despite minor differences in their appearance.
• The Intel Case: Intel Corporation faced a challenge from the German company Intellux AG over the use of the term "Intellilux." The ECJ found that the average consumer would not be confused between the two marks, as the goods and services offered by the companies were different.
• The Bayer Case: Bayer AG sought to register the trademark "Aspirin" for pharmaceutical products. However, the ECJ refused, citing the risk of confusion with the existing trademark "Aspirin" for pain relievers. The Court deemed that the average consumer would associate both marks with the same product.

Protecting Consumers and Innovators

The concept of the average consumer serves a dual purpose in trademark law: protecting consumers from confusion and incentivizing innovation. By preventing the registration of confusingly similar trademarks, the law safeguards consumers from purchasing goods or services under false pretenses.

Moreover, it encourages businesses to invest in creating distinctive trademarks, fostering a competitive and innovative market environment. Without clear guidelines regarding the likelihood of confusion, businesses would hesitate to develop new trademarks, stifling innovation and consumer choice.

The average consumer remains an enigmatic yet indispensable figure in confusion-based disputes within European Trademark Law. Courts strive to understand and apply this legal abstraction in a fair and consistent manner, balancing the interests of consumers, trademark owners, and society as a whole.

As we navigate the complexities of the modern marketplace, the concept of the average consumer will continue to evolve, shaped by technological advancements, changing consumer behaviors, and the ever-expanding frontiers of commerce. By embracing the challenges inherent in this legal construct, we can ensure that trademark law remains an effective tool for protecting both consumers and the spirit of innovation.

The Average Consumer in Confusion-based Disputes in European Trademark Law and Similar Fictions

4 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	1331 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	783 pages

FREE